European governments are closely monitoring energy security as tensions in the Middle East raise concerns about supply disruptions and rising fuel prices. The possibility of joint US-Israeli strikes on Iran, and potential retaliation targeting Gulf energy routes, has brought renewed focus on how resilient Europe’s energy mix is to external shocks.

Nuclear power remains a significant component, accounting for around 12% of the European Union’s overall energy mix. Despite recent increases in output, long-term trends show a decline in nuclear production across the bloc. Data from Eurostat indicates that nuclear generation fell by 20% between 2014 and 2024, and by 30% compared with 2004 levels.

In 2024, 12 EU countries produced nuclear energy, generating a combined 649,524 gigawatt-hours of electricity. This marked a 4.8% increase from 2023 and the second consecutive year of growth following a drop in 2022. However, analysts say these gains do not signal a sustained recovery.

The EU’s broader energy mix remains dominated by fossil fuels. Crude oil and petroleum products account for 38%, followed by natural gas at 21% and renewable energy at 20%. Nuclear energy contributes 12%, while solid fuels make up the remaining 10%.

Energy profiles vary widely across member states. France leads by a wide margin, with nuclear energy accounting for 40.3% of its total energy mix. It is followed by Slovakia at 29.7%, Sweden at 25.6%, and Bulgaria at 23.7%. Other countries such as Finland and Slovenia also maintain significant nuclear shares.

When it comes to electricity production, nuclear power plays an even larger role. Across the EU, it accounts for about 23.4% of electricity generation. France and Slovakia rely heavily on nuclear energy for electricity, with shares of 69% and 66.4% respectively. Several other countries, including Czechia, Finland, Hungary, Slovenia, and Bulgaria, generate around 40% of their electricity from nuclear sources.

Not all countries are following this path. Germany has phased out nuclear power entirely, with 2023 marking its final year of production. In contrast, countries like Belgium, Sweden, and Switzerland continue to rely on nuclear energy above the EU average, while others such as the Netherlands maintain only a minimal share.

The European Commission has maintained a neutral stance on energy sources, leaving decisions to individual member states. However, the current geopolitical climate has underscored the importance of diversification. Countries with stronger investments in nuclear and renewable energy are seen as better positioned to absorb shocks, while those heavily dependent on imported natural gas remain more vulnerable.

With the EU still importing 57% of its energy needs, according to the European Commission, the balance between domestic production and external reliance remains a critical issue as global uncertainties persist.

Washington will refund a French energy giant to exit US offshore wind plans, fueling criticism from environmental groups. The Trump administration has agreed to pay $1 billion (€860 million) to TotalEnergies SE to abandon two offshore wind leases off the coasts of North Carolina and New York. The French company will instead redirect the funds toward fossil fuel projects, according to a press statement from TotalEnergies.

“Considering that the development of offshore wind projects is not in the country’s interest, we have decided to renounce offshore wind development in the United States, in exchange for the reimbursement of the lease fees,” said Patrick Pouyanné, chairman and chief executive officer at TotalEnergies. He added that the refunded lease fees will finance a liquefied natural gas plant in Texas and support the company’s oil and gas activities, describing it as a “more efficient use of capital” in the US.

The Interior Department confirmed that after these investments, TotalEnergies will be reimbursed up to the amount initially paid for the offshore wind leases. The company acquired its Carolina Long Bay lease in 2022 for roughly $133 million (€115 million), aiming to generate more than 1 gigawatt of clean energy, enough to power about 300,000 homes. Its New York and New Jersey lease, also purchased in 2022 for $795 million (€685 million), was designed as a larger project capable of producing 3 gigawatts to supply nearly one million homes. TotalEnergies has significant experience in offshore wind projects in Europe and Asia.

The Trump administration has intensified efforts against offshore wind construction. Last year, it halted five major projects, including Denmark’s Ørsted development, citing national security concerns. Developers and states challenged the orders in court, and federal judges allowed all five projects to resume, ruling that the government had not demonstrated an immediate risk. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum described the current deal as “an innovative agreement” that prevents “ideological subsidies that benefited only the unreliable and costly offshore wind industry.” He praised TotalEnergies for committing to projects that deliver “dependable, affordable power” to US households.

Environmental groups, however, denounced the arrangement as a “billion-dollar bribe” to block clean energy. Lena Moffitt, executive director of Evergreen Action, said, “After losing again and again in court on his illegal stop-work orders, Trump has found another way to strangle offshore wind: pay them to walk away.” Ted Kelly, clean energy director at the Environmental Defense Fund, called it “an outrageous misuse of taxpayer dollars to prevent Americans from having clean, affordable power exactly when they need it most.”

East Coast states continue to invest in offshore wind to expand the supply of affordable electricity, even as natural gas prices rise. Critics warn the TotalEnergies deal could undermine these efforts at a critical moment for the transition to renewable energy.