Connect with us

Business

Retail Theft Costs German Economy €3 Billion in 2024, Fuelled by Organised Crime and Economic Strain

Published

12 months ago

on

Retail theft in Germany reached an all-time high in 2024, with losses totalling nearly €3 billion, according to a new report by the EHI Retail Institute. The alarming figure, driven in part by organised crime and worsening economic conditions, also highlights a significant hit to the federal treasury in lost tax revenue.

Based on a survey of 98 companies operating over 17,000 stores across the country, German retailers recorded €4.95 billion in missing inventory last year. Of that amount, €4.2 billion is attributed to theft — a 3% rise compared to 2023 — while the remainder is due to internal accounting errors and operational mistakes.

Shoplifting alone cost the retail sector an estimated €2.95 billion in 2024, up from €2.82 billion the previous year. Notably, theft by employees contributed to losses of €890 million, and suppliers or service providers were responsible for another €370 million.

Though official police statistics showed a 5% decline in reported shoplifting cases, the EHI report estimates that 98% of thefts go undetected, with most discovered only during inventory checks.

Organised retail crime has emerged as a growing threat. According to the study, theft linked to criminal gangs accounted for nearly one-third of all customer-related thefts — amounting to close to €1 billion. “Retailers are increasingly facing professional and aggressive theft rings. In many cases, store staff and security are simply outmatched,” the report said.

Rising poverty and inflation are also believed to be contributing factors. Germany’s economic slowdown, fuelled by high energy costs, declining industrial productivity, and global trade disruptions, has put pressure on households. Unemployment hit 6.2% in 2024, the highest since late 2020, and nearly 20% of the population is at risk of poverty or social exclusion.

See also  Middle East Tensions Spark Fears of Energy Crisis in Europe as LNG Supplies Face Disruption

Food retailers suffered the most, with losses of almost €2 billion, particularly in smaller supermarkets. Drugstores and hardware stores also reported higher-than-usual theft-related losses.

The financial impact extends beyond businesses. The government is estimated to have lost around €570 million in sales tax due to stolen goods, assuming that the majority of stolen items are taxable at standard VAT rates.

In response, retailers spent approximately €3.1 billion last year on security measures, including surveillance, employee training, anti-theft technology, and in-store detectives. Combined with direct theft losses, the total economic impact reached €7.3 billion — about 1.5% of the average purchase price passed on to consumers.

As retailers call for greater action against organised theft and increased support from law enforcement, the report warns that without targeted interventions, retail crime will continue to escalate in both scale and sophistication.

Related Topics:

Business

Oil Prices Slide as US–Iran Accord Eases Supply Fears While Markets React to Fed Policy Shift

Published

19 hours ago

on

June 18, 2026

By

Global crude prices extended losses on Thursday after the United States and Iran signed a memorandum of understanding aimed at ending their conflict and reopening the Strait of Hormuz, a key route for global energy shipments. Equity markets also responded unevenly as investors digested the Federal Reserve’s latest policy signals.

Oil benchmarks dropped in early trading following confirmation that US President Donald Trump and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian had signed an initial agreement designed to halt hostilities and restore normal maritime flows through the Strait of Hormuz. The waterway handles a significant share of global crude exports, and expectations of its reopening immediately weighed on prices.

At the time of writing, West Texas Intermediate fell 2.3% to around $75 a barrel, while Brent crude slipped about 2% to $78 a barrel. Although both benchmarks remain above pre-conflict levels near $70, they have retreated sharply from recent highs above $100 recorded during the height of the tensions.

The agreement sets a 60-day period for negotiations on a final settlement addressing Iran’s nuclear programme. In the interim, Tehran has agreed to reduce its stockpile of highly enriched uranium. The deal also includes provisions for easing sanctions, allowing Iran to resume oil exports and enabling tanker traffic to move more freely through the Persian Gulf.

US officials have indicated that the Strait of Hormuz could be fully reopened by Friday without transit fees, a development that has reinforced expectations of increased global supply. President Trump, commenting after the signing, said “oil down, stocks up,” reflecting market reactions to the accord.

Despite the easing outlook, the International Energy Agency has warned that global oil markets remain fragile. Strategic reserves in advanced economies have fallen to their lowest levels since 1990, with OECD stockpiles declining by more than 160 million barrels since the conflict began. The agency also revised down its demand forecast, citing weaker consumption and elevated fuel prices.

See also  Lisbon Becomes Most Expensive City for Student Rentals as Average Room Price in Portugal Surpasses €400

Flows through the Strait of Hormuz had already begun recovering before the agreement, reaching roughly 12 million barrels per day in early June after a period of disruption.

Financial markets, meanwhile, delivered a mixed performance following the Federal Reserve’s latest projections. Wall Street fell on Wednesday, with the S&P 500 down 1.2%, the Dow Jones off 1%, and the Nasdaq losing 1.3%, after policymakers signalled the possibility of interest rate increases later this year.

In his first press conference as Fed chair, Kevin Warsh avoided committing to a clear policy path, signalling a shift in how the central bank communicates future decisions. US President Donald Trump, attending the G7 summit in France, described the situation as “whatever,” while acknowledging uncertainty over potential rate hikes.

Early trading on Thursday pointed to a rebound, with US futures higher and Asian equities advancing on optimism over easing geopolitical risks. European markets opened more cautiously, reflecting lingering uncertainty despite the improving energy outlook.

Continue Reading

Business

Kevin Warsh Begins Fed Tenure as Markets Watch for Clues on Future Rate Path

Published

2 days ago

on

June 17, 2026

By

The US Federal Reserve enters a new phase on Wednesday as Kevin Warsh presides over his first policy meeting as chair, marking a closely watched leadership transition in American monetary policy. While economists broadly expect interest rates to remain unchanged, investors are focused on signals that could define the central bank’s direction under new leadership.

The Federal Open Market Committee is expected to keep the benchmark interest rate within the 3.50% to 3.75% range, extending a steady policy stance for a fourth consecutive meeting. The last adjustment came in December 2025, when rates were reduced by 25 basis points.

Although no immediate policy shift is anticipated, attention is centred on the language of the Fed’s statement and Chair Warsh’s first press conference. Analysts say even subtle changes in wording could indicate whether policymakers are leaning toward holding rates higher for longer or considering future increases if inflation remains persistent.

Warsh assumes leadership during a more complex economic environment than when he was previously associated with calls for lower interest rates. At that time, he aligned with arguments suggesting artificial intelligence-driven productivity gains could help ease inflation pressures. However, economists now point to continued inflationary risks tied to investment cycles in technology sectors, which have contributed to demand pressures across the economy.

Inflation has risen since the outbreak of the Iran conflict in February, reaching 4.2%, its highest level in three years, largely driven by higher energy costs. Although a US-backed framework for a peace deal has been announced, uncertainty remains over its durability, and analysts warn that any relief in fuel prices could take months to filter through to broader inflation measures.

See also  Wall Street Rises Ahead of Tariff Deadline as Investors Eye Global Trade Developments

The Fed’s preferred inflation gauge has remained above its 2% target for more than five years. At the same time, the labour market continues to show resilience, with 172,000 jobs added in May, marking the third consecutive month of solid employment growth. This stability has reduced pressure for further rate cuts that were previously projected earlier in the year.

Because interest rates are expected to remain unchanged, market attention has shifted to the Fed’s updated Summary of Economic Projections and the “dot plot”, which outlines policymakers’ expectations for future rate movements. Some economists, including those at Bank of America, anticipate that the projections may indicate no rate cuts through 2026, with a minority of officials even signalling potential rate increases.

Communication strategy is also expected to be a key focus under Warsh. He has previously argued that the Fed should reduce the frequency of public commentary to avoid constraining policy flexibility. One possible change could involve returning to fewer press conferences, a model last used under former Chair Ben Bernanke.

However, analysts caution that reduced communication could unsettle financial markets that have grown reliant on clear forward guidance from the central bank.

Adding to the complexity, former chair Jerome Powell remains on the Fed’s board as a governor and is expected to participate in Wednesday’s vote, maintaining influence over policy decisions during the transition period.

Continue Reading

Business

UniCredit’s €35 Billion Bid for Commerzbank Faces German Rejection as Takeover Battle Intensifies

Published

3 days ago

on

June 16, 2026

By

UniCredit’s hostile €35 billion takeover offer for Germany’s Commerzbank is set to close on Tuesday night, bringing to a head a politically charged banking battle that has drawn resistance from Berlin and renewed debate over consolidation in Europe’s financial sector.

The Milan-based lender launched its bid in early May in an effort to take control of Commerzbank and strengthen its position as a pan-European banking powerhouse. The offer, which formally expires at 11:59 p.m. local time unless extended, has already cleared the 30 percent acceptance threshold UniCredit had set as a key milestone.

However, the proposal has been widely criticised as undervaluing the German lender, and has faced firm opposition from both Commerzbank’s leadership and the German government. Berlin has repeatedly voiced concerns over the bid, warning that Commerzbank plays a critical role in financing Germany’s small and medium-sized enterprises as well as supporting employment in Frankfurt’s financial sector.

Germany’s Financial Market Stabilisation Fund rejected the offer outright on Tuesday, stating that it supports Commerzbank’s independence strategy and opposes what it described as UniCredit’s aggressive approach. Chancellor Friedrich Merz had earlier warned that the bid risks undermining trust in one of Germany’s key private banks.

In response, Commerzbank chief executive Bettina Orlopp has introduced a long-term strategy aimed at improving profitability by 2030, including cost-cutting measures and restructuring efforts designed to make the bank more efficient and attractive to investors.

UniCredit, meanwhile, has reported growing support for its bid, stating that acceptance levels stood at 11.9 percent as of Monday, in addition to its existing 26.7 percent stake. The bank has also disclosed exposure through derivatives linked to an additional share of Commerzbank’s capital.

See also  Eurozone Confidence Slips as France’s Political Turmoil Clouds Outlook

The Italian lender argues that surpassing the 30 percent threshold should allow it greater influence over governance, including the appointment of supervisory board representatives. That position has been firmly rejected by Commerzbank, which points to existing agreements with the German state that protect its role in board nominations.

Tensions between the two institutions have also escalated over allegations of misleading disclosures. Commerzbank has asked Germany’s financial regulator, BaFin, to investigate UniCredit’s reporting practices, while prosecutors in Frankfurt have opened a preliminary inquiry into possible market manipulation linked to trading activity during the offer period.

UniCredit has rejected all accusations, insisting its disclosures comply fully with regulatory requirements and accusing Commerzbank management of misrepresenting the facts to shape public perception.

Beyond pricing and governance disputes, the takeover attempt highlights broader concerns about consolidation in European banking and the future structure of national financial institutions. With the offer deadline approaching, the outcome will determine whether UniCredit can advance its ambition of reshaping its German operations through a deeper integration with Commerzbank or whether resistance from Berlin succeeds in halting the bid.

Continue Reading

Trending