Connect with us

Health

WHO Urges Continued Funding for PEPFAR as US Freezes Foreign Aid

Published

on

The World Health Organization (WHO) has called for continued funding of global HIV programmes following the recent decision by US President Donald Trump to freeze foreign aid, a move that threatens treatment and testing for millions worldwide.

The funding suspension puts at risk access to HIV diagnostics, medicines, and treatment in low- and middle-income countries, according to WHO officials. The organisation warned that halting these programmes could lead to severe health consequences, particularly in regions heavily impacted by HIV/AIDS.

Dire Consequences of Funding Cuts

“A funding halt for HIV programmes can put people living with HIV at immediate increased risk of illness and death and undermine efforts to prevent transmission in communities and countries,” the WHO said in a statement.

Health officials fear that an extended pause on foreign assistance could undo decades of progress in the fight against HIV/AIDS, potentially returning the world to conditions seen in the 1980s and 1990s when millions died annually due to lack of treatment.

As of 2023, nearly 39.9 million people worldwide were living with HIV, with two-thirds residing in sub-Saharan Africa. Despite a significant reduction in AIDS-related deaths—from 2.1 million in 2004 to 630,000 in 2023—the disease remains a leading global health crisis.

Impact on PEPFAR and Global HIV Efforts

The most affected programme by the funding freeze is the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), which has been instrumental in saving more than 26 million lives since its launch in 2003 under then-President George W. Bush.

In 2024, PEPFAR provided antiviral HIV treatment to 20.6 million people across 55 countries. The programme also initiated 2.5 million individuals on pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), a preventive measure against HIV infection, and facilitated testing for 83.8 million people.

Beyond direct patient care, PEPFAR supports 342,000 health workers worldwide whose jobs are now in jeopardy due to the funding suspension. The freeze also affects additional US-backed foreign aid initiatives that collectively provide HIV treatment to 30 million people.

US Pullback from Global Health Leadership

President Trump’s decision to freeze foreign aid for health initiatives marks another step in scaling back US global health commitments. In addition to pausing PEPFAR funding, he has initiated the process of withdrawing the US from the WHO and reinstated the Mexico City Policy, which restricts US funding to foreign organisations that provide abortion-related services or information.

Trump has cited dissatisfaction with the WHO’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and concerns over the disproportionate US financial contributions to the organisation as reasons for these decisions.

Calls for Exemptions and Humanitarian Waivers

WHO officials have been working with nations benefiting from PEPFAR to develop long-term strategies for reducing dependency on US aid by 2030. However, the abrupt funding halt threatens to derail these efforts, putting millions of lives at risk, according to the organisation.

The WHO is advocating for exemptions to allow the continued delivery of essential HIV treatment and care. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has reportedly granted a humanitarian waiver to maintain critical health services impacted by the freeze. According to The Washington Post, the waiver covers “core lifesaving medicine, medical services, food, shelter, and subsistence assistance.”

However, it remains unclear whether the exemption will apply to PEPFAR, leaving the future of millions of HIV patients in uncertainty. Global health advocates continue to urge the US government to reinstate funding for these essential programmes to prevent a major health crisis.

Health

Europe Pays Less for Medicines Than the U.S., but Prices Still Vary Widely by Country

Published

on

As former U.S. President Donald Trump reignites debate over America’s high drug prices, attention is once again turning to how Europe manages to pay far less for the same medicines—even if pricing remains inconsistent across the continent.

Trump, speaking to journalists on Monday, criticized the European Union for what he called “brutal” and “nasty” tactics in negotiating with pharmaceutical companies. He announced a proposal to link U.S. drug prices to the lowest rates paid by other wealthy nations, declaring: “We’re going to pay what Europe pays.”

According to a RAND Corporation analysis, the U.S. spent $617.2 billion (€542.7 billion) on pharmaceuticals in 2022—nearly three times the €205.3 billion spent by 24 European countries combined.

While it’s true that Europeans generally pay less, the picture within the region is far from uniform. A report by the World Health Organization (WHO) found that drug prices vary widely across Europe, largely due to confidential negotiations with drugmakers, national budget constraints, and differing approaches to price regulation.

In Switzerland, per capita spending on medicines reached €525, whereas Croatia spent just €262. These discrepancies reflect not only national income levels but also the complex and opaque nature of price-setting in the region. “There’s essentially no transparency,” said Huseyin Naci, an associate professor of health policy at the London School of Economics.

Many European countries base their pricing on what other nations pay and use cost-effectiveness assessments to determine value. England and Sweden emphasize whether a drug justifies its cost, while Germany looks at how much additional benefit it offers over existing treatments.

Still, costs have risen across the continent. In Germany, for instance, hospital drug prices increased 11.5% from 2012 to 2022, while retail pharmacy prices rose 2.6% in the same period. Health insurers have warned that rising prices are putting pressure on public health budgets.

If U.S. policy changes or drug companies push European nations to raise their prices, it would be highly disruptive,” Naci said.

European nations also differ in how drug costs are shared between public systems and individuals. In Cyprus, 90% of medicine expenses were covered by government or mandatory schemes in 2022. In Bulgaria, that figure was only 23%. Meanwhile, patients in some countries still pay out-of-pocket or through co-payments, depending on the condition being treated.

Despite lower overall spending, experts caution that European healthcare systems are already stretched thin. “There’s not much room left to absorb higher pharmaceutical costs,” Naci said.

Continue Reading

Health

Global Nurse Shortage Worsened by European Reliance on Foreign Healthcare Workers, WHO Warns

Published

on

A growing global shortage of nurses is being deepened by the increasing dependence of wealthier European nations on foreign-born healthcare professionals, according to a new report released by the World Health Organization (WHO) and partner organizations.

The report highlights a shortfall of 5.8 million nurses worldwide, with disproportionate reliance on international recruitment in Europe aggravating disparities between richer and poorer nations. While the global nursing workforce grew to 29.8 million in 2023—up from 27.9 million five years earlier—the gap in supply remains significant, particularly in low-income regions.

We cannot ignore the inequalities that mark the global nursing landscape,” said WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.

Europe and Central Asia collectively host 7.2 million nurses, with projections suggesting the region will require one million more by 2030. Europe currently has 76.9 nurses per 10,000 people—five times the rate found in Africa and the Eastern Mediterranean. Yet this apparent abundance masks deeper structural issues.

Ageing Workforce and Limited Recruitment

One of the key challenges is an ageing workforce. In 2023, only 31% of nurses in Europe were under the age of 35, while 21% were aged 55 or older. In Eastern Europe, older nurses outnumber younger ones—a trend that raises concerns about long-term workforce sustainability.

The report found that in around 20 countries—most of them in Western Europe—the number of new nurses is not keeping pace with healthcare demand. This is largely driven by retirements and the increasing needs of ageing populations.

Dependence on International Nurses

In 23 European countries surveyed, 14% of the nursing workforce was foreign-born and another 10% had trained abroad. The WHO report criticized high-income nations for underinvesting in their own nursing education systems, leading to an overreliance on talent from lower-income countries. This trend, it warned, is worsening workforce shortages in regions already struggling to meet healthcare demands.

There are striking inequalities in workforce distribution which have driven a surge in international recruitment and inequitable migration patterns,” said Howard Catton, CEO of the International Council of Nurses.

Training and Retention Challenges

Despite these concerns, Europe boasts a more developed training pipeline than most regions. In 2023, there were 42.7 new nurse graduates per 100,000 people in Europe, compared to a global average of 25.3. Much of this new talent comes from Central Asia, while Western Europe lags behind in nurse production.

European nurses also benefit from the highest starting salaries globally, with average entry-level pay at $2,508 (€2,205) per month. Additionally, 78% of European countries offer leadership development programmes for nurses—the highest rate globally.

The WHO report urges wealthier European countries to ramp up investment in domestic training programmes and implement stronger incentives to retain nurses, warning that continued reliance on international recruitment risks deepening global healthcare inequalities.

Continue Reading

Health

Early-Onset Cancer Rates Rising in U.S., But Deaths Mostly Stable, Study Finds

Published

on

A new U.S. government study has revealed that while cancer diagnoses among people under 50 are on the rise, the overall death rates for most types of cancer in this age group remain stable.

Published Thursday in the journal Cancer Discovery, the study is one of the most comprehensive assessments to date of early-onset cancers, analyzing data from more than two million cases diagnosed in Americans aged 15 to 49 between 2010 and 2019.

The findings show that 14 out of 33 cancer types had increasing incidence rates in at least one younger age group. The most significant increases were seen in breast, colorectal, kidney, and uterine cancers. Women accounted for about 63 percent of the early-onset cases.

This pattern generally reflects something profound going on,” said Tim Rebbeck of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, who was not involved in the study. “We need to fund research that will help us understand why this is happening.”

The study found that, compared to 2010 data, there were 4,800 more breast cancer cases, 2,000 additional colorectal cancers, 1,800 more kidney cancers, and 1,200 extra uterine cancers by 2019.

Despite the rising numbers, researchers emphasized a key reassurance: death rates for most of these cancers are not increasing. However, exceptions were noted—colorectal, uterine, and testicular cancers saw slight rises in mortality among younger adults.

The causes behind the rise in early-onset cancers are not fully understood. The study’s datasets do not include information on potential risk factors such as obesity, lifestyle, or access to healthcare. However, researchers, including lead author Dr. Meredith Shiels of the National Cancer Institute, highlighted obesity as a possible driver.

Several of these cancer types are known to be associated with excess body weight,” said Dr. Shiels. She also pointed to advances in detection and changing screening practices as possible contributors to earlier diagnoses.

Breast cancer trends may also be influenced by shifting reproductive patterns, such as women having children later in life, which has been associated with increased cancer risk due to fewer years of pregnancy and breastfeeding—factors known to lower risk.

Not all cancer types followed the upward trend. Rates of more than a dozen cancers, including lung and prostate cancer, are decreasing among younger people. Researchers attribute the lung cancer decline to reduced smoking rates, while updated PSA screening guidelines are likely behind the drop in prostate cancer diagnoses.

Experts plan to convene later this year to further investigate the growing early-onset cancer burden and explore targeted prevention strategies.

Continue Reading

Trending