Health
WHO Urges Continued Funding for PEPFAR as US Freezes Foreign Aid
The World Health Organization (WHO) has called for continued funding of global HIV programmes following the recent decision by US President Donald Trump to freeze foreign aid, a move that threatens treatment and testing for millions worldwide.
The funding suspension puts at risk access to HIV diagnostics, medicines, and treatment in low- and middle-income countries, according to WHO officials. The organisation warned that halting these programmes could lead to severe health consequences, particularly in regions heavily impacted by HIV/AIDS.
Dire Consequences of Funding Cuts
“A funding halt for HIV programmes can put people living with HIV at immediate increased risk of illness and death and undermine efforts to prevent transmission in communities and countries,” the WHO said in a statement.
Health officials fear that an extended pause on foreign assistance could undo decades of progress in the fight against HIV/AIDS, potentially returning the world to conditions seen in the 1980s and 1990s when millions died annually due to lack of treatment.
As of 2023, nearly 39.9 million people worldwide were living with HIV, with two-thirds residing in sub-Saharan Africa. Despite a significant reduction in AIDS-related deaths—from 2.1 million in 2004 to 630,000 in 2023—the disease remains a leading global health crisis.
Impact on PEPFAR and Global HIV Efforts
The most affected programme by the funding freeze is the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), which has been instrumental in saving more than 26 million lives since its launch in 2003 under then-President George W. Bush.
In 2024, PEPFAR provided antiviral HIV treatment to 20.6 million people across 55 countries. The programme also initiated 2.5 million individuals on pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), a preventive measure against HIV infection, and facilitated testing for 83.8 million people.
Beyond direct patient care, PEPFAR supports 342,000 health workers worldwide whose jobs are now in jeopardy due to the funding suspension. The freeze also affects additional US-backed foreign aid initiatives that collectively provide HIV treatment to 30 million people.
US Pullback from Global Health Leadership
President Trump’s decision to freeze foreign aid for health initiatives marks another step in scaling back US global health commitments. In addition to pausing PEPFAR funding, he has initiated the process of withdrawing the US from the WHO and reinstated the Mexico City Policy, which restricts US funding to foreign organisations that provide abortion-related services or information.
Trump has cited dissatisfaction with the WHO’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and concerns over the disproportionate US financial contributions to the organisation as reasons for these decisions.
Calls for Exemptions and Humanitarian Waivers
WHO officials have been working with nations benefiting from PEPFAR to develop long-term strategies for reducing dependency on US aid by 2030. However, the abrupt funding halt threatens to derail these efforts, putting millions of lives at risk, according to the organisation.
The WHO is advocating for exemptions to allow the continued delivery of essential HIV treatment and care. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has reportedly granted a humanitarian waiver to maintain critical health services impacted by the freeze. According to The Washington Post, the waiver covers “core lifesaving medicine, medical services, food, shelter, and subsistence assistance.”
However, it remains unclear whether the exemption will apply to PEPFAR, leaving the future of millions of HIV patients in uncertainty. Global health advocates continue to urge the US government to reinstate funding for these essential programmes to prevent a major health crisis.
Health
Europe Pays Less for Medicines Than the U.S., but Prices Still Vary Widely by Country
Health
Global Nurse Shortage Worsened by European Reliance on Foreign Healthcare Workers, WHO Warns
Health
Early-Onset Cancer Rates Rising in U.S., But Deaths Mostly Stable, Study Finds

A new U.S. government study has revealed that while cancer diagnoses among people under 50 are on the rise, the overall death rates for most types of cancer in this age group remain stable.
Published Thursday in the journal Cancer Discovery, the study is one of the most comprehensive assessments to date of early-onset cancers, analyzing data from more than two million cases diagnosed in Americans aged 15 to 49 between 2010 and 2019.
The findings show that 14 out of 33 cancer types had increasing incidence rates in at least one younger age group. The most significant increases were seen in breast, colorectal, kidney, and uterine cancers. Women accounted for about 63 percent of the early-onset cases.
“This pattern generally reflects something profound going on,” said Tim Rebbeck of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, who was not involved in the study. “We need to fund research that will help us understand why this is happening.”
The study found that, compared to 2010 data, there were 4,800 more breast cancer cases, 2,000 additional colorectal cancers, 1,800 more kidney cancers, and 1,200 extra uterine cancers by 2019.
Despite the rising numbers, researchers emphasized a key reassurance: death rates for most of these cancers are not increasing. However, exceptions were noted—colorectal, uterine, and testicular cancers saw slight rises in mortality among younger adults.
The causes behind the rise in early-onset cancers are not fully understood. The study’s datasets do not include information on potential risk factors such as obesity, lifestyle, or access to healthcare. However, researchers, including lead author Dr. Meredith Shiels of the National Cancer Institute, highlighted obesity as a possible driver.
“Several of these cancer types are known to be associated with excess body weight,” said Dr. Shiels. She also pointed to advances in detection and changing screening practices as possible contributors to earlier diagnoses.
Breast cancer trends may also be influenced by shifting reproductive patterns, such as women having children later in life, which has been associated with increased cancer risk due to fewer years of pregnancy and breastfeeding—factors known to lower risk.
Not all cancer types followed the upward trend. Rates of more than a dozen cancers, including lung and prostate cancer, are decreasing among younger people. Researchers attribute the lung cancer decline to reduced smoking rates, while updated PSA screening guidelines are likely behind the drop in prostate cancer diagnoses.
Experts plan to convene later this year to further investigate the growing early-onset cancer burden and explore targeted prevention strategies.
-
Business12 months ago
Saudi Arabia’s Model for Sustainable Aviation Practices
-
Business12 months ago
Recent Developments in Small Business Taxes
-
Politics12 months ago
Who was Ebrahim Raisi and his status in Iranian Politics?
-
Business10 months ago
Carrectly: Revolutionizing Car Care in Chicago
-
Business11 months ago
Saudi Arabia: Foreign Direct Investment Rises by 5.6% in Q1
-
Technology12 months ago
Comparing Apple Vision Pro and Meta Quest 3
-
Politics12 months ago
Indonesia and Malaysia Call for Israel’s Compliance with ICJ Ruling on Gaza Offensive
-
Sports9 months ago
Keely Hodgkinson Wins Britain’s First Athletics Gold at Paris Olympics in 800m