Health
Study Links Hormonal IUDs to Slightly Increased Breast Cancer Risk in Young Women
Copenhagen, Denmark — A recent study from the Danish Cancer Institute has found that hormone-releasing intrauterine devices (IUDs) may be associated with a slightly higher risk of breast cancer among young women. The large-scale study, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), has prompted health professionals to reconsider the risks and benefits of hormonal contraceptives.
The research examined health outcomes for around 79,000 women, aged 15 to 49, who used hormonal IUDs, such as the Mirena coil, compared to a similar group of women who did not use any form of hormonal birth control. The women were monitored over an average of 6.8 years. While the overall risk of developing breast cancer remained low, the study found that hormonal IUD users faced a slightly higher risk—about 14 additional cases of breast cancer per 10,000 women.
Hormonal IUDs, which release a progesterone-like hormone to prevent pregnancy, are commonly used across Europe, with about 8.1% of reproductive-age women relying on this form of contraception. Unlike copper IUDs, which do not involve hormones, devices like the Mirena coil work by slowly releasing hormones directly into the uterus. Many medical professionals had previously believed this localized hormone release posed a lower risk of breast cancer compared to oral contraceptive pills, which expose the body to higher levels of hormones.
However, the new findings challenge this assumption. “The results of this study are highly unexpected,” said Dr. Channa Jayasena, a reproductive endocrinologist at Imperial College London, who was not involved in the research.
The study has limitations, as it did not account for lifestyle factors like smoking, alcohol consumption, and obesity, all of which are known breast cancer risk factors. These unmeasured variables could influence the study’s results, but the data has nonetheless raised concerns.
Doctors and researchers are now advising that healthcare providers include potential breast cancer risks when discussing hormonal IUDs with patients. “My advice for women is that breast cancer risk caused by [IUDs] is not established but warrants a closer look,” Jayasena added.
This is not the first study to suggest a link between hormonal contraceptives and breast cancer. Last year, researchers at the University of Oxford found that progestogen-only contraceptives, regardless of their form, were associated with a slight increase in breast cancer risk. Experts suggest that the increased risk from IUDs may be similar to that posed by oral contraceptives.
Despite the findings, there remains broad medical consensus that the benefits of hormonal contraception outweigh the risks. Dr. Mangesh Thorat, a breast cancer surgeon and researcher at Queen Mary University of London, noted that certain types of IUDs have been shown to reduce the risks of cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancers.
Thorat also highlighted that contraceptive risks change with age, suggesting that women nearing 40 should consider non-hormonal alternatives in consultation with their healthcare providers.
Health
Europe Faces Growing Challenges in Meeting Medical Care Needs, EU Report Shows

A new report has highlighted stark disparities in healthcare access across Europe, revealing that a growing number of citizens face unmet medical needs due to systemic issues such as high costs and long waiting times.
According to the latest data from Eurostat and the Health at a Glance: Europe 2024 report, 3.8 per cent of EU residents aged 16 and over reported unmet medical needs in the past year. However, the percentage climbs significantly when focusing solely on individuals who actively required healthcare services — with some countries reporting unmet needs among over 20 per cent of this group.
The causes are twofold: healthcare system barriers, including long waiting lists and treatment costs, account for 2.4 per cent of all cases, while 1.4 per cent stem from personal reasons such as fear of doctors, lack of time, or lack of knowledge about available care.
Unmet healthcare needs vary widely across the continent. Estonia tops the list within the EU, with 15.5 per cent of people reporting unmet needs, followed closely by Greece and Albania, each over 13 per cent. Even wealthier Nordic countries show surprising figures — Denmark (12.2 per cent), Finland, and Norway (over 7.5 per cent) — despite high healthcare spending. Conversely, countries such as Germany (0.5 per cent), Austria (1.3 per cent), and the Netherlands (1.4 per cent) report the lowest levels, pointing to more efficient and accessible healthcare systems.
Cost is a dominant barrier in nations like Greece and Albania, where over 9 per cent of citizens cited unaffordable care. In contrast, long waiting times are the primary issue in countries like Estonia (12 per cent) and Finland (7.5 per cent).
Income inequality also plays a major role. On average, 3.8 per cent of low-income individuals across the EU report unmet needs due to healthcare system issues — more than triple the 1.2 per cent reported by higher-income groups. In Greece, that gap is particularly wide, with 23 per cent of low-income respondents affected.
Healthcare experts say these disparities reflect more than just economic factors. Dr. Tit Albreht, President of the European Public Health Association (EUPHA), noted, “Unmet health needs arise from different reasons, including how well healthcare governance integrates services to meet population needs.”
Industry leaders, such as Tina Taube of the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA), stressed the importance of timely access to diagnosis and treatment. “Unmet needs are context-specific,” she said. “It’s not just about product availability, but also healthcare system readiness.”
Andy Powrie-Smith of EFPIA added that patients in some European countries wait up to seven times longer than others for the same treatments due to regulatory delays and varying national infrastructures.
The findings underscore the need for a more coordinated, equitable healthcare strategy across the continent, especially as Europe faces the challenges of an ageing population and increasingly complex medical technologies.
Health
Chinese Nationals Charged in U.S. with Smuggling Toxic Fungus Labeled a Potential Agroterrorism Threat

U.S. federal authorities have charged two Chinese nationals in connection with smuggling a dangerous agricultural fungus into the country, a move investigators describe as posing significant national security risks.
Yunqing Jian, 33, and Zunyong Liu, 34, are accused of conspiracy, smuggling, making false statements, and visa fraud after allegedly attempting to bring Fusarium graminearum — a toxic fungus capable of devastating crops and harming humans and livestock — into the United States. The case was detailed in a court filing by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in Detroit.
The fungus, which targets essential food staples like wheat, maize, barley, and rice, is described in a scientific journal cited by the FBI as a “potential agroterrorism weapon.” Experts warn that its spread could inflict serious damage on global food security and agricultural economies.
U.S. Attorney Jerome Gorgon Jr. emphasized the seriousness of the case, stating: “The alleged actions of these Chinese nationals, including a loyal member of the Chinese Communist Party, are of the gravest national security concerns.”
Jian made her first appearance in a Detroit federal court on Tuesday and remains in custody awaiting a bond hearing scheduled for Thursday. A court-appointed attorney for her initial appearance declined to comment.
According to the FBI’s complaint, the investigation began in July 2024 when Liu was stopped at Detroit Metropolitan Airport. During a routine screening, customs officials discovered suspicious red plant material in his backpack. Liu initially claimed not to know what it was but later admitted he planned to use it for research purposes at the University of Michigan, where Jian is currently employed and where Liu previously worked.
Authorities say Liu’s mobile phone contained an article titled “Plant-Pathogen Warfare under Changing Climate Conditions,” raising further concerns about the intended use of the samples. The FBI believes the two individuals were coordinating to introduce the pathogen into a U.S. research setting without proper clearance or oversight.
Liu was denied entry to the U.S. and deported in July. Charges against both individuals were filed this week, as prosecutors continue to investigate the scope of the alleged conspiracy.
The case underscores growing concerns in the U.S. over biosecurity and potential misuse of scientific research amid rising geopolitical tensions.
Health
US Expands Measles Vaccination Guidance Amid Global Surge in Cases
-
Business1 year ago
Saudi Arabia’s Model for Sustainable Aviation Practices
-
Business1 year ago
Recent Developments in Small Business Taxes
-
Politics1 year ago
Who was Ebrahim Raisi and his status in Iranian Politics?
-
Business11 months ago
Carrectly: Revolutionizing Car Care in Chicago
-
Business11 months ago
Saudi Arabia: Foreign Direct Investment Rises by 5.6% in Q1
-
Technology1 year ago
Comparing Apple Vision Pro and Meta Quest 3
-
Politics1 year ago
Indonesia and Malaysia Call for Israel’s Compliance with ICJ Ruling on Gaza Offensive
-
Sports10 months ago
Keely Hodgkinson Wins Britain’s First Athletics Gold at Paris Olympics in 800m