Connect with us

News

Russian Commander Reportedly Dismissed Over False Claims on Ukraine War Progress

Published

on

Colonel General Gennady Anashkin, commander of Russia’s South Forces Group, has reportedly been removed from his position following allegations of providing misleading information about military progress in eastern Ukraine. The reports, originating from Russian military bloggers and local media outlets, suggest that Anashkin falsely claimed advances near the settlement of Siversk in the Donetsk region.

The dismissal was first reported by military bloggers, including Rybar, a prominent pro-Russian source on Telegram. Rybar criticized the handling of the situation, noting that several settlements near the frontline had become “synonymous with lies and unjustified losses.” The blog added, “It took the system about two months to respond to it properly.”

Russian news outlet RBC also confirmed Anashkin’s removal, citing unnamed sources within the Ministry of Defense. The sources claimed the decision was part of a “planned rotation.” However, no official statement has been made by the Russian government or military, leaving the exact reasons for Anashkin’s dismissal unclear.

A Challenging Frontline for Both Sides

Ukraine’s army chief described the current situation on the frontlines as “one of the most powerful Russian offensives” since the full-scale invasion began in February 2022. However, progress has reportedly been uneven, with heavy resistance from Ukrainian forces in some areas.

The contested Siversk settlement in Donetsk is one of several locations where false claims about Russian advances have reportedly been made. Military bloggers allege that inaccurate reports from multiple commanders have contributed to significant losses among Russian troops.

The Role of Military Bloggers in the Conflict

Military bloggers have become an influential source of information in the ongoing conflict. Many of these bloggers maintain close connections with Russia’s armed forces or pro-Russian separatist groups in eastern Ukraine, offering insights and often blunt criticism of military operations.

Rybar and other bloggers have pointed to systemic issues in Russia’s military strategy, including poor communication and the spread of inaccurate battlefield reports. Such criticism underscores a growing tension within Russia’s military apparatus as it faces prolonged resistance from Ukraine.

Context of the Dismissal

While Russia’s Ministry of Defense has yet to comment, Anashkin’s reported dismissal reflects a broader effort to address leadership and operational challenges within the Russian military. The slow progress and setbacks on key fronts have drawn increasing scrutiny, not only from military analysts but also from within pro-Russian circles.

The removal of a high-ranking officer like Anashkin could signal attempts by Moscow to recalibrate its strategy, though the true impact of such leadership changes on the ground remains uncertain.

News

EU Seeks Closer Defence Ties with Ukraine, Citing Battle-Tested Innovation

Published

on

The European Union has launched a new initiative to deepen defence cooperation with Ukraine, drawing on the war-torn country’s battlefield experience to strengthen European capabilities in key areas such as drone production.

The EU-Ukraine Defence Industries Task Force held its inaugural meeting on Monday, aiming to enhance industrial collaboration between Kyiv and Brussels. The effort was announced by European Commissioner for Defence and Space Andrius Kubilius during the second EU-Ukraine Defence Industry Forum.

Kubilius emphasized the urgency of integrating Ukraine’s rapidly evolving defence sector into Europe’s broader security framework, particularly in light of its advancements in unmanned systems and supply chain resilience.

Today, we announce the creation of the inter-institutional EU-Ukraine Task Force,” he said. “Ukrainian and European experts will now work together to develop joint projects and facilitate procurement processes that strengthen both our defence industries.”

The task force will focus on priority capabilities, especially explosives and drones. According to Kubilius, Ukraine’s innovation in drone production has positioned it as a global leader in the field. “We need to learn from Ukraine how to create a drone production and operation infrastructure,” he said, asserting that Europe stands to gain even more from this integration than Ukraine.

Since Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022, Ukraine has increased its annual defence production capacity to €35 billion — a 35-fold rise. Kubilius highlighted Ukraine’s ability to deliver modern, cost-effective defence solutions, describing its companies as “fast” and capable of producing at “half the price” of their European counterparts.

Alexander Kamyshin, an advisor to President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, told the forum that the ongoing conflict would be remembered as “the first world drone war.” He noted Ukraine’s success in developing autonomous targeting systems and swarming drone capabilities, technologies he said the country is willing to share with European allies.

We’re here to build the arsenal of the free world together,” Kamyshin declared.

The EU is set to invest heavily in its defence sector over the next four years, including up to €650 billion in new fiscal allocations and €150 billion through a new loan programme dubbed SAFE. The initiative is designed to support joint procurement and could benefit Ukrainian firms as well.

Talks on the SAFE programme are expected to conclude by the end of May, with disbursements likely to begin by early 2026. Meanwhile, a broader strategic planning effort, including a new Industry Outlook based on member states’ capability targets, is set to be unveiled in June.

Peace through strength will come from production power and brain power,” Kubilius said. “To stop Putin, we need to produce more, innovate more, and we need to do that together: in the EU and with Ukraine.”

Would you like a version of this tailored for print or online publication?

Continue Reading

News

Spy Scandal Strains Hungary-Ukraine Relations as Minority Rights Talks Collapse

Published

on

A deepening espionage scandal has plunged Hungary and Ukraine into a new diplomatic rift, with Budapest abruptly suspending planned talks on the rights of ethnic Hungarians in Ukraine’s Transcarpathia region.

According to Ukrainian officials, negotiations that were due to take place on May 12 in Uzhhorod were called off at the last minute by Hungary, despite the Ukrainian delegation already having arrived in the border town. The discussions were meant to address 11 Hungarian recommendations to strengthen the rights of the Hungarian minority living in the southwestern Carpathian region.

The suspension comes amid a growing diplomatic row sparked by Ukrainian allegations of Hungarian espionage. On May 9, Ukraine’s Security Service (SBU) announced that it had uncovered a Hungarian military intelligence network operating on Ukrainian territory. Two former Ukrainian soldiers were detained, accused of collecting sensitive military information for Budapest. The network was reportedly overseen by a Hungarian intelligence officer.

In response, Ukraine expelled two Hungarian diplomats. Hungary retaliated in kind, expelling two Ukrainian officials. Hungarian Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó dismissed the allegations as “propaganda,” stating that Hungary had not received any formal communication from Kyiv regarding the charges.

Tensions escalated further on Friday when Hungary’s Counter-Terrorism Centre detained a Ukrainian citizen in central Budapest. According to Hungarian authorities, the individual—described as a middle-aged man previously operating under diplomatic cover—was expelled from the country overnight for espionage. The National Directorate General for Aliens determined that his activities posed a “serious threat to Hungary’s sovereignty.”

The individual was deported after the situation was clarified,” the Hungarian government said in a statement, adding that the suspect no longer had diplomatic immunity.

The deteriorating relations have cast a shadow over longstanding concerns about minority rights in Transcarpathia, where ethnic Hungarians have lived for generations. Hungary has frequently criticized Ukraine for failing to uphold linguistic and cultural rights, while Kyiv has accused Budapest of interfering in its internal affairs.

With both sides now trading expulsions and suspending dialogue, the prospects for resolving the minority rights dispute — or cooling tensions more broadly — appear increasingly uncertain.

The incident marks the latest flashpoint in what has been a historically uneasy relationship between the two neighbours, now further complicated by war, security fears, and mounting geopolitical pressure.

Continue Reading

News

Bulgaria to Hold Referendum on Euro Adoption Amid Political and Economic Debate

Published

on

In a move that could reshape the country’s economic future, Bulgarian President Rumen Radev announced he would submit a request to parliament for a referendum on whether the country should adopt the euro as its official currency.

Bulgaria, as a full member of the European Union, faces a strategic decision — the introduction of the single European currency,” Radev said in a national address. “The referendum will be a test of the National Assembly’s democracy and will show who is following democratic principles and who is denying Bulgarians the right to determine their future.”

The push to adopt the euro comes amid years of political turmoil and economic challenges for Bulgaria, which has been part of the European Union since 2007. The decision to pursue eurozone membership has not been without its hurdles. In 2024, the European Central Bank (ECB) rejected Bulgaria’s bid to join the currency union, citing high inflation as a major obstacle.

In February 2025, the debate reached a boiling point when police in Sofia clashed with nationalist protesters who opposed the government’s plans. About 1,000 demonstrators gathered in front of the European Commission’s Sofia office, throwing red paint and firecrackers at the building, which resulted in a door being set on fire.

While the new government, formed just last month, has made joining the eurozone a priority, not everyone is convinced that Bulgaria is ready for the economic shift. Some economists argue that the country does not yet meet the necessary economic conditions for euro adoption, citing issues such as inflation and fiscal stability.

However, the Bulgarian government, with the backing of pro-European parties in parliament, maintains that adopting the euro is crucial for deeper European integration. As geopolitical tensions rise in Europe, they argue that adopting the euro would help secure Bulgaria’s place within the European project.

At the same time, nationalist factions, particularly those with pro-Russia sympathies, have ramped up opposition to the eurozone bid. These groups are reportedly spreading disinformation in an effort to sway public opinion and create fear around the potential impacts of euro adoption.

As Bulgaria moves toward the referendum, the country finds itself at a crossroads. The decision to adopt the euro will not only affect the economy but could also reshape the nation’s political and diplomatic future within the EU.

The outcome of the referendum remains uncertain, with significant divisions within the country about the advantages and risks of joining the eurozone.

Continue Reading

Trending