Connect with us

News

Germany’s Opposition Leader Friedrich Merz Criticized for Accepting AfD Support

Published

on

Germany’s opposition leader and frontrunner for the next chancellorship, Friedrich Merz, is facing widespread criticism after accepting support from the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party to push through a controversial migration proposal.

The move has drawn backlash from across the political spectrum, including a rare public rebuke from former Chancellor Angela Merkel, who condemned Merz for breaking a long-standing commitment to not cooperate with the AfD.

Breaking a Political Taboo

On Wednesday, Merz’s centre-right Christian Democrats (CDU) pushed a non-binding motion calling for stricter border and asylum policies through parliament. The measure passed by a narrow margin, with AfD votes playing a decisive role. This marks the first time an AfD-backed motion has been approved in the German Bundestag, with the far-right party hailing it as a “historic day for Germany.”

Merkel, who led Germany for 16 years, called Merz’s decision “wrong”, reinforcing her long-held position that mainstream parties should not collaborate with the AfD.

Merz defended his actions in a heated debate before the vote, arguing that tougher migration policies were necessary to stem rising violence in Germany.

“I am not looking for any other majorities in this Bundestag than those in the democratic centre,” he said. “If there was such a majority here today, then I regret it.”

Migration and Security Concerns Take Center Stage

Merz’s hardline stance on migration follows a series of violent incidents involving asylum seekers.

The most recent attack, in Aschaffenburg, saw a rejected Afghan asylum-seeker arrested for a knife attack that killed a man and a two-year-old boy. Similar knife attacks in Mannheim and Solingen last year, involving suspects from Afghanistan and Syria, have fueled growing public concern over immigration.

Another Christmas market attack in Magdeburg, allegedly carried out by a Saudi doctor, has further intensified the debate as Germany heads toward elections on February 23.

Merz has repeatedly argued that Germany’s asylum and immigration policies have been flawed for nearly a decade, dating back to Merkel’s decision to welcome a large influx of migrants in 2015.

With the CDU leading in opinion polls, Merz’s party is pushing for a radical overhaul of Germany’s immigration system, calling for stricter border controls, faster deportations, and tougher asylum policies.

Government Backlash and European Concerns

The outgoing coalition government, led by Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s Social Democrats (SPD), the Greens, and the Free Democratic Party (FDP), has sharply criticized Merz’s motion.

Scholz dismissed the proposal, arguing that it violates German and EU asylum laws. He also warned that Merz’s actions risk damaging Germany’s reputation as a reliable European partner.

Interior Minister Nancy Faeser echoed these concerns, warning that the motion jeopardized joint European action on migration in favor of “dangerous national solo efforts.”

“The debates in Germany are causing irritation among our European neighbors,” Faeser added.

While the European Commission declined to comment on the political debate, EU migration commissioner Magnus Brunner acknowledged that stronger measures were needed to improve deportation policies across the bloc.

Public Protests Erupt in Berlin

Following the Bundestag vote, hundreds of demonstrators gathered outside CDU headquarters in Berlin, protesting the party’s decision to align with the AfD on migration. Among the groups present was Amnesty International, which has warned against strict migration policies undermining human rights protections.

With less than a month until the election, Merz’s controversial decision could shape the political landscape—either solidifying his lead among conservative voters or triggering a backlash that could weaken his chances of becoming Germany’s next chancellor.

News

Putin Announces Temporary Easter Ceasefire in Ukraine

Published

on

By

Russian President Vladimir Putin has declared a temporary ceasefire in Ukraine to mark the Easter holiday, according to a statement issued by the Kremlin on Saturday. The truce, described as a humanitarian gesture, will be in effect from 6:00 p.m. Moscow time (1500 GMT) on Saturday until midnight on Sunday (2100 GMT), following Orthodox Easter celebrations.

“Guided by humanitarian considerations, today from 18:00 to 00:00 from Sunday to Monday, the Russian side declares an Easter truce. I order that all military actions be stopped for this period,” President Putin was quoted as saying during a meeting with Chief of the General Staff Valery Gerasimov. The announcement was made through the Kremlin’s official press service.

Putin expressed hope that Ukraine would reciprocate the gesture. “We assume that the Ukrainian side will follow our example,” he said, while also instructing Russian troops to remain vigilant. “At the same time, our troops must be ready to repel possible violations of the truce and provocations from the enemy, any of its aggressive actions.”

So far, there has been no official response from Kyiv regarding the proposed ceasefire. Ukrainian officials have yet to confirm whether they will observe the temporary truce.

The ceasefire announcement came on the same day Russia’s Defense Ministry claimed a military gain near the Ukraine border. Russian forces reportedly captured the village of Oleshnya in the Kursk region — one of the last Ukrainian footholds in that area, according to the ministry. However, the Associated Press noted that it could not independently verify the claim, and Ukrainian authorities have not issued a statement in response.

The announcement of the truce arrives amid continued hostilities in eastern and southern Ukraine, with both sides engaged in intense fighting despite periodic calls for peace. Previous attempts at temporary ceasefires, including those tied to religious holidays, have often failed to hold due to mutual accusations of violations.

The Kremlin’s move appears to be an attempt to frame Russia’s actions as being guided by humanitarian motives, possibly aimed at improving its international image during a deeply entrenched conflict. Nonetheless, observers remain skeptical about the effectiveness or sincerity of such temporary measures without a broader agreement in place.

The Orthodox Easter, a significant religious holiday in both Russia and Ukraine, is often seen as an opportunity for brief moments of reflection and reprieve from conflict. Whether this latest ceasefire will bring any tangible pause to the violence remains uncertain.

Continue Reading

News

US and Ukraine Sign Memorandum Paving Way for Controversial Mineral Deal

Published

on

By

Ukraine and the United States have signed a preliminary memorandum of intent aimed at finalizing a far-reaching economic partnership and reconstruction investment fund focused on mineral exploitation. The document, seen by Euronews, marks a significant step toward what could be a landmark agreement shaping Ukraine’s post-war economic recovery.

The memorandum, signed on Thursday by Ukraine’s First Deputy Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko and US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, sets the stage for high-level negotiations in Washington between April 21 and 26. According to the document, Ukrainian Prime Minister Denys Shmyhal will travel to Washington during that week to lend political backing to the final round of technical discussions.

The goal is to conclude talks by April 26 and sign the agreement shortly afterward. “Negotiating teams are expected to report on progress by April 26, 2025, with the aim of completing discussions by that date and signing as soon as possible,” the document reads.

The proposed agreement is not without controversy. It outlines the creation of a joint investment fund that would give the US considerable influence over Ukraine’s critical infrastructure and natural resources. The fund’s board would be made up of five members—three appointed by the US and two by Ukraine—effectively granting Washington veto power over major decisions.

Under the deal, Ukraine would be required to submit all major infrastructure and resource projects—including those involving roads, ports, railways, and mineral extraction—to the fund for approval. If rejected, Kyiv would be barred from offering the same projects to other countries under more favorable terms.

Furthermore, the US would receive all profits generated by the fund and a 4% annual return until the total military and financial assistance—estimated at €114 billion by the Kiel Institute for the World Economy—is repaid. This “payback” structure has been championed by former President Donald Trump, who remains a key figure in ongoing US foreign policy despite current tensions with Ukrainian leadership.

The agreement also notes potential legal conflicts with Ukraine’s EU accession obligations and international financial commitments. However, the US pledged not to interfere in those matters. “The United States respects Ukraine’s intention to avoid conflicts in the drafting of the agreement with Ukraine’s obligations under European Union accession,” the document states.

The deal comes amid growing tensions between the US and Ukraine. Relations have deteriorated since Trump initiated backchannel talks with Russian officials to end the war, reportedly excluding Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy from the process. A heated Oval Office meeting between Trump and Zelenskyy in February only deepened the rift.

Meanwhile, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio was in Paris this week to consult with European allies. Speaking to reporters Friday, Rubio warned that Washington could pull out of peace negotiations if no meaningful progress is achieved soon.

As talks in Washington approach, the proposed investment fund is expected to dominate headlines—and draw scrutiny over its implications for Ukraine’s sovereignty and economic independence.

Continue Reading

News

Biden Blasts Trump Over Social Security Cuts in First Major Post-Presidency Speech

Published

on

By

In his first major public address since leaving office, former U.S. President Joe Biden launched a scathing critique of his successor, accusing President Donald Trump of dismantling the nation’s welfare system and putting millions of Americans at risk.

Speaking at a disability rights event in Chicago on Tuesday, Biden, 82, took aim at recent developments within the Social Security Administration (SSA), which provides vital benefits to over 70 million Americans. He warned that job cuts and funding reductions under Trump’s leadership could severely disrupt the delivery of services to some of the country’s most vulnerable citizens.

“In fewer than 100 days, this new administration has done so much damage and so much destruction. It’s kind of breathtaking,” Biden told the audience. “Social Security deserves to be protected for the good of the nation as a whole.”

Biden accused Trump of taking “a hatchet” to the country’s welfare safety net in a bid to slash federal spending. Though Trump has repeatedly vowed not to cut Social Security benefits, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), an unofficial agency aligned with the administration, plans to eliminate 7,000 jobs from the SSA.

The plan is being overseen by DOGE head and Trump ally Elon Musk, who has controversially called Social Security “the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time.” The proposed staffing cuts have sparked widespread concern that benefit payments may be delayed or disrupted due to reduced agency capacity.

Already, thousands of SSA employees have departed the agency, leading to reports of website crashes and unresponsive customer service lines. Biden said such dysfunction could lead to “a calamity for millions of families” who rely on timely benefits.

Criticizing the speed and aggression of Trump’s budget cuts, Biden remarked that the administration is “shooting first and aiming later.” He emphasized the long-standing bipartisan consensus that Social Security should remain untouched, calling its preservation a moral obligation.

In response to Biden’s remarks, the Trump administration accused the former president of spreading misinformation. “He’s lying to Americans,” a White House spokesperson said.

Jason Turkish, a prominent disability lawyer based in Michigan who represents 32,000 clients, echoed Biden’s concerns. “There’s always been a belief that Social Security is just something we do not touch,” he said. “But now, people are genuinely worried.”

Since leaving office earlier this year, Biden has largely remained out of the political spotlight, aside from occasional public appearances. He was recently seen attending the opening night of Othello on Broadway and frequently commutes between his Delaware home and his Washington, D.C., office.

Tuesday’s address marks a return to the national stage for Biden and signals his growing concern over the direction of domestic policy under the Trump administration.

Continue Reading

Trending