Business
Commerzbank Announces €400 Million Share Buyback Amid UniCredit Takeover Battle
Frankfurt, Germany – Commerzbank has announced plans to buy back shares worth up to €400 million, according to its earnings statement released on Friday. The move comes as the German lender fends off a potential takeover by Italy’s UniCredit.
The bank confirmed that it had secured regulatory approvals for the buyback, which it aims to complete by its Annual General Meeting in mid-May.
Strong Earnings and Increased Dividends
Commerzbank reported earnings of €2.68 billion for 2024, reflecting a 20% increase compared to 2023. The bank’s revenues grew by 6% year-on-year to €11.11 billion, driven by higher commission income and interest returns.
Additionally, the bank announced an increase in its dividend to €0.65 per share, up from €0.35 in the previous year. This means that from 2022 to 2024, Commerzbank will have returned €3.1 billion to shareholders.
CEO Stresses Strength of Commerzbank as a Standalone Entity
Commerzbank CEO Bettina Orlopp emphasized that the bank had exceeded its capital return promise to investors.
“By consistently managing costs and focusing on growth initiatives, we were able to significantly increase the net result for the past financial year,” Orlopp said in a statement.
She also reaffirmed that Commerzbank remains an attractive investment, sending a clear message to investors as she works to defend the bank from UniCredit’s takeover attempt.
UniCredit’s Growing Stake Raises Political Concerns
Under CEO Andrea Orcel, UniCredit has been steadily increasing its stake in Commerzbank. In December, the Italian lender raised its holdings to 28%, having previously disclosed a 9% stake in September.
UniCredit initially acquired the shares through derivatives, a method that allowed it to avoid immediate disclosure. This has sparked criticism from German politicians, who accused the Italian bank of lacking transparency about its intentions.
Upcoming Strategy Meeting
Orlopp is set to present an updated strategy to Commerzbank’s board of managing directors on February 13, in an effort to reinforce the bank’s independence and convince shareholders that a takeover is unnecessary.
As the battle for control of Germany’s second-largest lender continues, Commerzbank’s latest financial results and shareholder-friendly initiatives could play a key role in determining the bank’s future.
Business
DHL Express to Suspend High-Value Consumer Shipments to U.S. Amid Regulatory Changes

DHL Express, the international courier division of Germany’s Deutsche Post, announced it will temporarily suspend global business-to-consumer (B2C) shipments valued over $800 to individuals in the United States starting April 21. The move comes in response to new U.S. customs regulations that have extended clearance times for incoming goods.
According to a notice published on the company’s website, the suspension affects only shipments above the $800 threshold sent to private individuals. Business-to-business (B2B) shipments will continue but may experience delays due to the new processing requirements. Shipments under $800, whether destined for individuals or businesses, remain unaffected.
The change follows an April 5 update to U.S. customs rules, which now require formal entry processing for all imports valued over $800. Previously, this threshold stood at $2,500. DHL cited the revised policy as the reason for the temporary suspension, as the additional paperwork and procedural requirements have significantly slowed customs clearance.
“This is a temporary measure,” the company stated, without specifying when services might resume.
While the announcement was undated, online metadata indicates it was compiled on Saturday. The update marks a significant shift for international logistics companies that rely on streamlined processes to handle high-volume e-commerce shipments.
DHL’s decision comes amid rising trade tensions and shifting import policies in the United States, particularly concerning packages from China and Hong Kong. Last week, Hongkong Post suspended sea mail services to the U.S., accusing Washington of “bullying” after the United States revoked duty-free trade provisions for packages from the region.
In response to earlier inquiries from Reuters, DHL emphasized its commitment to compliance, saying it would continue processing shipments from Hong Kong “in accordance with the applicable customs rules and regulations.” The company also said it is working with customers to help them adapt to the upcoming changes, particularly those set to take effect on May 2.
Industry analysts say the new U.S. customs policy could have a wide-reaching impact on cross-border e-commerce, as formal entry requirements typically involve additional documentation, processing fees, and longer delivery times. Retailers and logistics firms alike are now reassessing their operations to minimize disruption for customers.
DHL has not provided a specific date for when high-value B2C shipments to the U.S. will resume but indicated that the pause is a precautionary response to the evolving regulatory environment.
Business
Trump Administration Imposes New Fees on Chinese Ships, Escalating Trade Tensions
The Trump administration on Thursday announced new fees targeting Chinese-built and Chinese-owned vessels docking at U.S. ports, escalating the ongoing trade war between Washington and Beijing. The move is aimed at countering China’s growing dominance in the global shipbuilding industry and protecting U.S. maritime interests.
The announcement, made by the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR), follows a year-long investigation launched under the Biden administration into China’s shipbuilding practices. USTR Ambassador Greer said the decision is designed to “begin to reverse Chinese dominance, address threats to the U.S. supply chain, and send a demand signal for U.S.-built ships.”
The new policy will introduce fees based on net tonnage per voyage for Chinese-built and owned vessels entering U.S. ports. This first phase is set to take effect in 180 days. A second phase, targeting foreign-owned liquefied natural gas (LNG) vessels built in China, will be implemented within three years.
The fees could reach as high as $1 million for each Chinese-built ship and $1.5 million for foreign-owned carriers with Chinese-built vessels in their fleets, according to findings from the USTR investigation. The move marks a significant shift in maritime trade policy, as the U.S. seeks to reduce its dependency on Chinese-made ships.
The USTR probe, launched in April 2024 under Section 301 of the 1974 Trade Act, was prompted by a petition from five national labor unions raising concerns over China’s increasing control over global shipping. The USTR concluded that China’s practices unfairly displaced foreign competitors and reduced global competition in maritime logistics.
China currently dominates the global shipbuilding market, with Chinese-built vessels accounting for 81% of the total market share in 2024. In the energy sector, China controls 48% of the liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) vessel market and 38% of the LNG sector, according to Veson Nautical.
In response to last year’s proposal, China’s Ministry of Commerce criticized the U.S. investigation as “a mistake on top of a mistake.” However, no official statement has been issued following the latest U.S. policy announcement.
Despite the new maritime fees, President Trump appeared to signal a pause in further tariff hikes. Speaking to reporters, he said, “At a certain point, I don’t want [tariffs] to go higher because… you make it where people don’t buy.” Trump indicated he may lower existing tariffs to avoid further disruption in trade flows.
Currently, the Trump administration has imposed tariffs of 145% on all Chinese imports, while China has retaliated with 125% tariffs on U.S. goods. In response, Beijing has hinted at shifting its countermeasures to the U.S. services sector, including legal consultancy, tourism, and education.
As tensions continue to rise, the shipping fee move represents a broader effort by Washington to reshape global trade and strengthen domestic manufacturing — though it risks inflaming economic ties with China even further.
Business
Global Luxury Sector Faces New Blow as US-China Trade War Escalates
The global luxury industry, already grappling with declining demand and changing consumer habits, faces a new hurdle as the trade war between the United States and China intensifies. Analysts warn that the sector’s fragile recovery may be further threatened by President Donald Trump’s recent decision to hike tariffs on Chinese goods to as high as 245%.
According to a memorandum seen by Euronews, the luxury market is forecasted to grow modestly at 1% to 3% annually between 2024 and 2027. This is a sharp slowdown compared to the 5% yearly growth seen between 2019 and 2023, and 9% between 2021 and 2023, as highlighted in a report by McKinsey.
China and the US are two of the largest luxury markets globally. In 2023, China accounted for 22%–24% of global luxury consumption, while US consumers contributed around 21% of total revenue in 2024, according to Bain & Company and Bank of America. Popular products in both markets include handbags, cosmetics, footwear, and leather goods, with brands such as Chanel, Dior, Louis Vuitton, Gucci, and Prada dominating sales.
However, economic slowdowns in both countries, combined with rising inflation and interest rates, have already caused luxury shoppers to scale back. The cost of living crisis in several regions has shifted consumer preferences toward more durable and budget-conscious purchases. Furthermore, luxury brands that raised prices post-pandemic without matching innovation are losing their exclusivity appeal.
The latest round of US tariffs, coupled with retaliatory Chinese tariffs currently at 125%, have added fresh uncertainty to the sector. Global stock markets have responded negatively, wiping billions in market capitalization from luxury giants. Shares of Lululemon Athletica dropped 20.7% on Nasdaq, Prada Group fell 23.4% on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, and Kering and LVMH declined 26.3% and 19.9% respectively on Euronext Paris.
LVMH, often seen as a bellwether for the luxury industry, reported a 2% dip in Q1 2025 revenue to €20.3 billion. Fashion and leather goods revenue dropped 4%, perfumes and cosmetics remained flat, and wines and spirits fell 8%. Only watches and jewelry showed growth with a modest 1% increase.
Beyond China, US tariffs on EU goods—although reduced to 10% temporarily—also pose risks. The US imports various luxury products from Europe, including wine, chocolate, high-end apparel, and cars. These tariffs could increase prices for American consumers, potentially leading to reduced spending.
Additionally, the fragmented and globalized supply chains of luxury brands may incur hidden costs due to tariffs, further squeezing margins and complicating logistics.
In a surprising twist, the rising cost of luxury imports has led some Chinese manufacturers to promote knock-off products directly to US consumers via platforms like TikTok. Claiming to be original equipment manufacturers, they offer imitations of products like Birkin bags and Lululemon leggings at steep discounts. While their claims are largely unverified, Chinese wholesale platform DHgate has surged to the number two spot on the US Apple App Store, signaling growing consumer interest in alternatives amid rising prices.
As trade tensions deepen, the luxury sector is bracing for further disruptions in an already turbulent market landscape.
-
Business11 months ago
Saudi Arabia’s Model for Sustainable Aviation Practices
-
Business11 months ago
Recent Developments in Small Business Taxes
-
Politics11 months ago
Who was Ebrahim Raisi and his status in Iranian Politics?
-
Business10 months ago
Carrectly: Revolutionizing Car Care in Chicago
-
Business10 months ago
Saudi Arabia: Foreign Direct Investment Rises by 5.6% in Q1
-
Technology11 months ago
Comparing Apple Vision Pro and Meta Quest 3
-
Politics11 months ago
Indonesia and Malaysia Call for Israel’s Compliance with ICJ Ruling on Gaza Offensive
-
Technology11 months ago
Recent Developments in AI Ethics in America