The popular Netflix series Adolescence has ignited fresh discussions on the dangers of social media and smartphones for children, with some calling for a ban. However, experts caution that prohibiting social media use may not effectively address the root of the problem.

A recent survey by Amnesty International revealed that 73% of Gen Z social media users in the UK (aged 13-28) have encountered misogynistic content online, with half witnessing such material weekly. The findings coincide with heightened scrutiny on social media following Adolescence, which depicts the fictional murder of a schoolgirl by a 13-year-old boy influenced by social media.

The show’s co-creator, Jack Thorne, has urged the UK government to ban smartphones for children under 16, mirroring Australia’s recent move to restrict social media access for minors. Despite these calls, experts argue that banning social media is not a viable solution.

A study published in Lancet Regional Health Europe—the first of its kind—analyzed the impact of school-based smartphone bans across England. The research found no significant improvement in students’ mental well-being, sleep, or educational outcomes. While the study only covered school-time restrictions, it casts doubt on the effectiveness of outright prohibitions.

Drew Benvie, founder of the social media campaign group Raise, warns that delaying social media exposure until age 16 may be counterproductive. “What happens when a child is 15 years and 364 days old? They suddenly gain unrestricted access without prior education on its dangers,” Benvie told Euronews Next. He also noted that children often bypass bans using VPNs, as seen with attempts to block TikTok in the United States.

Misogynistic content remains a significant concern. According to the Amnesty International report, 57% of Gen Z men in the UK have consumed content from controversial figures like Elon Musk, former U.S. President Donald Trump, and Andrew Tate. Tate, a prominent online figure, has been criticized for spreading misogynistic views, yet his content continues to circulate on major platforms.

Social media companies have implemented measures to protect children. TikTok introduced a mindfulness tool for users under 16 that activates after 10 p.m., while Meta and other platforms have strengthened parental controls. However, experts argue these steps are insufficient, as algorithms continue to amplify harmful content. A study by University College London and the University of Kent found a fourfold increase in misogynistic content suggested by TikTok’s algorithm within five days of monitoring.

Experts suggest that rather than bans, comprehensive education on digital literacy, misogyny, and misinformation is crucial. Benvie stresses that parental involvement is also key. “Parents should use these apps themselves to understand them and engage in open discussions with their children about harmful content,” he said.

While education plays a critical role, Benvie insists that tech companies and regulators must take stronger action. “Banning social media outright is not a practical solution,” he said. “Instead, we need regulation, education, and enforcement to ensure a safer digital environment for children.”

The administration of U.S. President Donald Trump is considering implementing a sweeping travel ban that would prohibit entry from 11 countries, according to a report by The New York Times on Friday. The proposed restrictions are part of a broader classification system that also includes an “orange list” of nations facing severe visa restrictions.

The “Red List” Ban

According to The New York Times, a draft list of recommendations developed by diplomatic and security officials suggests that travelers from the following 11 countries would be completely barred from entering the United States:

• Afghanistan
• Bhutan
• Cuba
• Iran
• Libya
• North Korea
• Somalia
• Sudan
• Syria
• Venezuela
• Yemen

The proposed ban, if enacted, would dramatically expand existing travel restrictions, which have already targeted several Muslim-majority nations under previous executive orders issued by Trump.

Expanded Restrictions on the “Orange List”

In addition to the outright ban on “red list” countries, the administration is also weighing sharp visa restrictions for another set of nations categorized under an “orange list.” The countries facing tighter visa regulations include:

• Belarus
• Eritrea
• Haiti
• Laos
• Myanmar
• Pakistan
• Russia
• Sierra Leone
• South Sudan
• Turkmenistan

These restrictions could mean fewer work, student, and tourist visas issued to citizens of these countries, potentially impacting thousands of travelers.

Final Decision Still Uncertain

While the draft proposal originated from the U.S. State Department several weeks ago, The New York Times noted that it is still subject to revision before reaching the White House for a final decision. Officials who spoke anonymously to the publication cautioned that modifications to the list are possible as the administration assesses potential diplomatic and security consequences.

The report has already drawn sharp reactions, with critics arguing that the travel bans could exacerbate diplomatic tensions and disrupt families and businesses. Supporters, however, claim the measures are necessary to protect national security and control immigration flows.

With the 2024 election cycle approaching, any move to expand travel bans could become a highly polarizing issue, potentially shaping Trump’s policy agenda if he returns to office.

European countries with strong Atlantic swells, including Spain, France, and Ireland, are emerging as key players in harnessing wave energy, one of the world’s largest untapped renewable resources.

According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), ocean power generation needs to grow by 33% annually to help achieve global net-zero targets by 2050. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) estimates wave energy could generate up to 29,500 terawatt-hours (TWh) per year—nearly ten times Europe’s annual electricity consumption.

“Wave and tidal energy have the potential to be significant, reliable, and sustainable power sources,” said José Miguel Rodrigues, a senior research scientist at SINTEF, one of Europe’s largest research institutes. Unlike wind and solar, tidal energy is governed by predictable gravitational cycles, providing a steady electricity supply that helps balance the grid.

A breakthrough in wave energy technology comes from Swedish company CorPower Ocean. Inspired by the pumping mechanism of the human heart, cardiologist Dr. Stig Lundbäck co-founded the company in 2009. Their ‘CorPack’ wave energy converter—a lightweight buoy—converts the up-and-down motion of waves into rotational energy, which is then transformed into electricity. According to CorPower Ocean, the device produces five times more electricity per tonne of equipment compared to previous technologies.

“CorPower has steadily progressed through development stages, securing investment and research grants, particularly from the EU,” Rodrigues noted. The company’s first full-scale wave energy converter is currently deployed off Portugal’s northern coast near Aguçadora, where it is supplying power to the national grid.

Other innovators are also making strides in the sector. Italian energy company ENI has developed the Inertial Sea Wave Energy Converter, while China’s Nanku floating generator and Finland’s AW-Energy’s WaveRoller, featuring large underwater panels, are further advancing the technology.

Despite its potential, wave and tidal energy still face challenges in achieving commercial viability at scale. “The key challenge is competitiveness,” Rodrigues explained. “Wave energy must demonstrate both consistent performance and the ability to withstand extreme ocean forces. Many prototypes have failed or underperformed, while offshore wind and solar have proven reliability and cost-effectiveness.”

European nations like Portugal, Spain, France, Ireland, and the UK have the most favorable conditions for large-scale wave energy projects due to their exposure to Atlantic swells. Norway, with its extensive coastline and remote island communities, also presents a strong market where wave energy could reduce grid costs and enhance energy independence.

Ultimately, the success of wave energy hinges on not just technological advancements but also economic viability, social acceptance, and supportive government policies. With continued innovation and investment, wave energy could soon play a vital role in Europe’s transition to a cleaner, more sustainable energy future.