Connect with us

Health

Experts Call for Overhaul in Obesity Diagnosis Amid Criticism of BMI Reliance

Published

on

Global health experts have called for a fundamental reevaluation of how obesity is diagnosed, urging a shift from the long-standing reliance on body mass index (BMI) to a more nuanced and individualized approach. The recommendations come from a panel of 56 specialists and patients, who published their findings in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology.

A Complex Condition

Obesity, affecting roughly one in eight people worldwide, is a risk factor for numerous health conditions, including type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and certain cancers. However, experts argue that it is not always synonymous with ill health. The commission has proposed distinguishing between clinical obesity, a chronic disease marked by organ dysfunction or physical limitations caused by excess fat, and preclinical obesity, where individuals have obesity but maintain normal organ function.

“There are some people who have obesity and manage to live a relatively normal life … and on the other hand, you have [people] who may suffer significant health issues due to obesity alone,” said Dr. Francesco Rubino, the commission’s chair and a professor at King’s College London.

BMI Under Fire

BMI, a measure derived from a person’s weight and height, has been the primary diagnostic tool for obesity since the World Health Organization adopted it in the 1990s. A BMI of 30 or higher classifies an adult as obese. While BMI offers a simple proxy for body fat and related health risks, critics say it is flawed and outdated.

“It’s not just how much fat you have, it’s also where the fat is that’s important,” said Dr. Adam Collins, a nutrition expert at the University of Surrey. He highlighted that BMI does not account for fat distribution or differentiate between fat and muscle mass, leading to potential misclassifications.

Athletes with high muscle mass, for example, may fall into the obese category despite being in excellent health.

A New Framework

The commission has recommended that BMI remain a preliminary screening tool but that an official diagnosis of clinical obesity should involve more comprehensive criteria. These include signs such as obesity-induced breathlessness, heart failure, and joint pain, among others.

Adopting this approach could reduce overdiagnosis and ensure medical care is tailored to an individual’s health needs rather than focusing solely on weight loss. This shift is especially crucial as governments debate how to allocate resources, such as expensive weight-loss drugs like Wegovy and Mounjaro, which are in limited supply.

Changing Perspectives

Beyond medical practice, experts hope the new framework will combat the stigma around obesity and promote better understanding of metabolic health for people of all sizes. “This leads to a change in practice and, maybe even before that, a change in mindsets,” Rubino said.

Though it may take time to implement these changes, advocates believe this step could reshape how obesity is perceived and treated globally.

Health

Tanzania Reports Deadly Marburg Virus Outbreak, Eight Fatalities Confirmed

Published

on

By

Tanzania is grappling with an outbreak of the highly lethal Marburg virus, with eight fatalities confirmed so far, global health authorities reported.

The World Health Organization (WHO) identified the outbreak in the Biharamulo and Muleba districts of the Kagera region, an Eastern African transit hub. As of January 11, nine suspected cases have been reported, including healthcare workers. The Marburg virus, which is related to Ebola, has a case fatality rate of up to 89%, according to WHO officials.

Symptoms and Transmission

WHO said the suspected patients displayed classic symptoms of Marburg, such as high fever, headache, back pain, diarrhea, vomiting with blood, and severe physical weakness. In later stages, external hemorrhaging may occur.

The virus is transmitted through contact with bodily fluids of infected individuals or contaminated surfaces, putting healthcare workers and close contacts at heightened risk.

“There is an expectation of further cases as disease surveillance improves,” WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said in a social media update.

Containment Efforts Underway

Rapid response teams have been deployed to the affected areas to investigate and contain the outbreak. Authorities are tracing contacts of infected individuals, setting up treatment centers, and enhancing public awareness to prevent further spread.

However, officials caution that detection and isolation of cases have been delayed due to the Kagera region’s role as a transit hub, which may have facilitated the virus’s spread.

Neighbouring countries, including Rwanda, Uganda, Burundi, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, have been urged to remain vigilant. “We recommend neighbouring countries be on alert and prepared to manage potential cases,” Tedros said.

No Approved Vaccine or Treatment

Marburg virus outbreaks are rare but severe, with fatality rates ranging from 24% to 88%. There is currently no authorized vaccine or treatment, although experimental options are being tested.

In 2023, a similar outbreak occurred in Tanzania’s Kagera region, resulting in nine cases and six deaths. Another outbreak in Rwanda last year sickened 66 people and caused 15 deaths before being declared over in December.

Zoonotic reservoirs, such as fruit bats, are believed to play a role in the virus’s transmission and remain endemic to the region, WHO noted.

Global Risk Assessment

While the risk of global spread is low, WHO considers the threat high for Tanzania and its regional neighbors. Health authorities are focusing on containing the outbreak swiftly to prevent a broader crisis.

“Marburg virus outbreaks underscore the need for robust surveillance systems and rapid response measures to protect public health,” the agency said in a statement.

Continue Reading

Health

Air Pollution Causes 239,000 Deaths in Europe, Unevenly Impacting Regions

Published

on

By

Air pollution remains one of Europe’s deadliest public health challenges, contributing to approximately 239,000 premature deaths in 2021 due to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) exposure, according to the European Environment Agency (EEA). Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) exposure accounted for an additional 48,000 deaths, highlighting the urgent need for stricter air quality regulations across the continent.

Regional Disparities in Air Pollution

The burden of air pollution is not evenly distributed, with Eastern Europe suffering disproportionately. North Macedonia reports the highest pollution-related mortality rates, followed by Serbia, Albania, Bulgaria, and Montenegro, according to a joint report by the European Commission and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

Zorana Jovanovic Andersen, an environmental epidemiology professor at the University of Copenhagen, noted that socioeconomic disparities between Eastern and Western Europe align closely with pollution-related health risks.

In Northern Italy, Poland, and the Czech Republic, residential sources like coal heating and agriculture drive high PM2.5 mortality rates. Meanwhile, NO2-related deaths, largely attributed to traffic and industrial emissions, are most prevalent in major cities across Western and Southern Europe.

Efforts to Address the Crisis

In 2021, the World Health Organization (WHO) updated its air quality guidelines, reducing recommended thresholds for PM2.5 and NO2 concentrations. To align with these standards, the European Union introduced stricter air quality rules in December, aiming to cut PM2.5-related deaths by 55% by 2030.

Mark Nieuwenhuijsen, director of the Barcelona Institute for Global Health’s urban planning initiative, described the updated directive as “one of the biggest public health interventions for a generation.”

The EU directive also grants citizens the right to sue their governments for failing to meet air quality standards. Denmark is taking additional steps, proposing a carbon tax on livestock farming to reduce agricultural emissions.

Persistent Challenges

Despite progress, experts warn that reducing air pollution alone may not fully eliminate its health impacts. Nieuwenhuijsen explained that even significant reductions in pollutant levels might not correspond to proportional decreases in health risks.

Moreover, air pollution often intersects with other environmental challenges, such as noise pollution, lack of green spaces, and climate change. Together, these factors amplify public health threats, particularly for older adults, who experience higher mortality rates linked to air pollution.

“While we’ve made strides in reducing pollution, new challenges are emerging,” Andersen said, emphasizing the importance of continued regulation.

As Europe pushes for cleaner air, experts agree that addressing pollution is a vital step toward mitigating the broader impacts of environmental and climate-related health risks.

Continue Reading

Health

Handwashing Habits Across Europe Highlight Hygiene Gaps Amid Flu Season

Published

on

By

As Europe faces a flu outbreak, personal hygiene practices, particularly handwashing, are coming under scrutiny. Influenza, though often underestimated due to advancements in vaccines, claims an estimated 27,600 lives annually across the continent, underscoring the importance of basic hygiene measures.

Recent data on Europeans’ handwashing habits reveals significant disparities between nations in their commitment to this essential practice. The findings, while nearly a decade old, highlight enduring habits that remain relevant today.

Hygiene Lapses in the Netherlands and Southern Europe

The Netherlands stands out as a country where hand hygiene needs improvement, with nearly half of Dutch individuals reportedly neglecting to wash their hands after using the restroom. Italy follows closely, with 43% of its population skipping the soap-and-water routine.

Spain (39%) and France (38%) also rank poorly, alongside Russia (37%). In Austria and Latvia, 35% of people admit to forgoing handwashing after bathroom use.

Central and Eastern Europe Show Mixed Results

Poland demonstrates a stronger commitment to hygiene, with 68% of its population practicing regular handwashing. Slightly better scores are observed in Czechia and Ukraine, where 71% of individuals wash their hands, followed by Bulgaria at 72%.

Switzerland, Ireland, and the UK perform well, with handwashing rates ranging between 73% and 75%. Scandinavian nations, including Finland (76%) and Sweden (78%), align closely with Germany and Iceland, both also scoring 78%.

Southeastern Europe Leads the Way

Countries in Southeastern Europe top the charts for hand hygiene. Serbia reports an 83% compliance rate, followed by Romania (84%) and Kosovo (85%). Portugal matches Kosovo’s figures, with only 15% of its population neglecting post-restroom handwashing.

Bosnia and Herzegovina and Türkiye lead the continent, with 96% and 94% of their populations, respectively, adhering to regular handwashing. These nations serve as examples of prioritizing hygiene, a practice especially crucial during flu season.

The Importance of Hand Hygiene

The data highlights a clear divide in hygiene practices across Europe, emphasizing the need for greater public awareness. Handwashing is one of the most effective ways to prevent the spread of infections, including influenza, yet it remains overlooked in many countries.

As flu season persists, health experts urge citizens to adopt rigorous hygiene habits. While the statistics may be dated, the trends they reveal about handwashing reflect enduring cultural attitudes that health campaigns must continue to address.

With proper education and awareness, Europe could significantly reduce the spread of flu and other communicable diseases, ensuring healthier outcomes for all.

Continue Reading

Trending